The
company has applied all of the principles set out in section 1 of
the Combined Code on Corporate Governance (the Code) relating to
the structure and composition of the board, the remuneration of
the directors, relations with shareholders and procedures for financial
reporting, audit and internal control of the group. This statement
describes how the principles of the Code have been applied.
Throughout the year, the company has been in compliance with
the provisions of the Code with the exception of the matter noted
on page 29.
Directors and the Board
The board is responsible to the company’s shareholders for the
group’s system of corporate governance, its strategic objectives
and the stewardship of the company’s resources. The board meets
at least seven times per year and delegates specific responsibilities
to board committees, as described below. The board reviews the
key activities of the business, and receives papers and presentations
to enable it to do so effectively. The Company Secretary is responsible
to the board, and is available to individual directors, in respect
of board procedures.
The board comprises the Chairman, the Chief Executive, four
other executive directors and six other independent non-executive
directors.The role of non-executive directors is to enhance independence
and objectivity of the board’s deliberations and decisions.The
executive directors have specific responsibilities, which are
detailed on pages 22 and 23, and have direct responsibility for
all operations and activities.
All directors submit themselves for re-election every three
years.
Committees of the Board
The Chief Executive’s Committee is responsible for the recommendation
to the board of strategic and operating plans and on decisions
reserved to the board where appropriate. It is also responsible
for the executive management of the group’s business.The Committee
is chaired by the Chief Executive and meets monthly. It comprises
the executive directors and three senior executives of the company.
The Audit Committee is a sub-committee of the board whose purpose
is to assist the board in the effective discharge of its responsibilities
for financial reporting and corporate control. The Committee is
chaired by Mr H R Jenkins and meets twice a year. It comprises
all the non-executive directors with the Chief Executive, the
Finance Director and the external and internal auditors in attendance.
The Nomination Committee is a sub-committee of the board responsible
for advising the board and making recommendations on the appointment
of new directors. The Committee is chaired by Mr H M P Miles and
comprises all the non-executive directors.
The Management Development and Remuneration Committee (MDRC)
is a sub-committee of the board which determines on behalf of
the board the remuneration of the Chief Executive, executive directors
and senior management. The Committee is chaired by Mr H M P Miles
and comprises all the non-executive directors.The Chief Executive
and Director of Human Resources attend by invitation except when
their own performance and remuneration are discussed.
Directors’ Remuneration
The Remuneration Report on pages 30 to 37 [see PDF version of this document], includes details of
remuneration policies and of the remuneration of the directors.
Relations with Shareholders
The company reports formally to shareholders twice a year, when
its half year and full year results are announced and an interim
report and a full report are issued to shareholders. At the same
time, executive directors give presentations on the results to
institutional investors, analysts and the media in London and
other international centres.
The Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the company takes place
in London and formal notification is sent to shareholders with
the annual report at least 20 working days in advance of the meeting.The
directors are available, formally during the AGM, and informally
afterwards, for questions. Details of the 2000 AGM are set out
in the notice of the meeting enclosed with this annual report.
During the year, the Chief Executive, Finance Director and executive
directors maintain a dialogue with institutional shareholders
on the company’s progress through a programme of meetings. All
executive directors speak regularly at external conferences and
presentations.
Accountability, Audit and Internal
Control
The statement of directors’ responsibilities in relation to the
accounts is set out on page 37[see PDF version of this document].
In its reporting to shareholders, the board aims to present
a balanced and understandable assessment of the group’s financial
position and prospects.
The group has adopted the transitional approach to Internal
Control under the Combined Code as outlined in the letter from
the London Stock Exchange to listed companies in September 1999.
As a result the directors confirm that they have reviewed the
effectiveness of the group’s system of internal financial controls.
The existing risk management and internal control processes
necessary to implement the guidance ‘Internal Control: Guidance
for Directors on the Combined Code’ have been modified and a report
on the application of the Internal Control principle D.2 will
be included in the annual report and accounts for the year ending
31st March 2001.
The board has overall responsibility for the group’s system
of internal controls, which are designed to meet the group’s needs
and address the risks to which it is exposed. Such a system can
provide reasonable but not absolute assurance against material
misstatement or loss.
The group’s organisational structure is focused on its three
wholly owned divisions. These entities are all separately managed,
but report to the board through a board director. The executive
management team receive monthly summaries of financial results
from each division through a standardised reporting process.
The board meets annually to consider the strategy for individual
divisions and again annually to review three year financial plans.The
group has in place a comprehensive annual budgeting process including
forecasts for the next two years. Variances from budget are closely
monitored.The group’s treasury policies are discussed in the financial
review on page 10. The principal aspects of these policies are
approved by the board. Specific criteria exist for the approval
of significant contracts and other legal agreements. A committee
of the board reviews significant items of this nature.
The Group Control Manual, which is distributed to all group
operations, clearly sets out the composition, responsibilities
and authority limits of the various board and executive committees
and also specifies what may be decided without central approval.
It is supplemented by other specialist policy and procedures manuals
issued by the group, divisions and individual business units or
departments.The high intrinsic value of many of the metals with
which the group is associated necessitates stringent physical
controls over precious metals held at the group’s sites.
The internal audit function is responsible for monitoring the
group’s systems of internal financial controls and the control
and the integrity of the financial information reported to the
board.The Audit Committee receives the reports produced by the
internal audit function on a regular basis. Actions are agreed
with management in response to the internal audit reports produced.
In addition, significant business units through a programme of
self-assessment provide assurance on the maintenance of financial
controls and compliance with group policies. These assessments
are summarised by the internal audit function and a report is
made annually to the Audit Committee.
Non-Compliance with the Combined Code
The item in the Code with which the company did not comply in
full throughout the period together with the appropriate Code
reference is stated below:
Three of the executive directors are employed on contracts subject
to two years’ notice at any time, which the MDRC considers appropriate
in the overall context of the executive directors’ terms of employment.
It is not currently proposed that this should be reduced further
for existing service contracts. In the event of early termination
of service contracts the MDRC strongly endorses the principle
of requiring the directors to mitigate their loss (B.1.7).
Going Concern
The directors have a reasonable expectation that the group has
sufficient resources to continue in operational existence for
the foreseeable future and have, therefore, adopted the going
concern basis in preparing the accounts.