JM home
Annual Report & Accounts 2000



Previous pageTable of Contents
The company has applied all of the principles set out in section 1 of the Combined Code on Corporate Governance (the Code) relating to the structure and composition of the board, the remuneration of the directors, relations with shareholders and procedures for financial reporting, audit and internal control of the group. This statement describes how the principles of the Code have been applied.

Throughout the year, the company has been in compliance with the provisions of the Code with the exception of the matter noted on page 29.

Directors and the Board
The board is responsible to the company’s shareholders for the group’s system of corporate governance, its strategic objectives and the stewardship of the company’s resources. The board meets at least seven times per year and delegates specific responsibilities to board committees, as described below. The board reviews the key activities of the business, and receives papers and presentations to enable it to do so effectively. The Company Secretary is responsible to the board, and is available to individual directors, in respect of board procedures.

The board comprises the Chairman, the Chief Executive, four other executive directors and six other independent non-executive directors.The role of non-executive directors is to enhance independence and objectivity of the board’s deliberations and decisions.The executive directors have specific responsibilities, which are detailed on pages 22 and 23, and have direct responsibility for all operations and activities.

All directors submit themselves for re-election every three years.

Committees of the Board
The Chief Executive’s Committee is responsible for the recommendation to the board of strategic and operating plans and on decisions reserved to the board where appropriate. It is also responsible for the executive management of the group’s business.The Committee is chaired by the Chief Executive and meets monthly. It comprises the executive directors and three senior executives of the company.

The Audit Committee is a sub-committee of the board whose purpose is to assist the board in the effective discharge of its responsibilities for financial reporting and corporate control. The Committee is chaired by Mr H R Jenkins and meets twice a year. It comprises all the non-executive directors with the Chief Executive, the Finance Director and the external and internal auditors in attendance.

The Nomination Committee is a sub-committee of the board responsible for advising the board and making recommendations on the appointment of new directors. The Committee is chaired by Mr H M P Miles and comprises all the non-executive directors.

The Management Development and Remuneration Committee (MDRC) is a sub-committee of the board which determines on behalf of the board the remuneration of the Chief Executive, executive directors and senior management. The Committee is chaired by Mr H M P Miles and comprises all the non-executive directors.The Chief Executive and Director of Human Resources attend by invitation except when their own performance and remuneration are discussed.

Directors’ Remuneration
The Remuneration Report on pages 30 to 37 [see PDF version of this document], includes details of remuneration policies and of the remuneration of the directors.

Relations with Shareholders
The company reports formally to shareholders twice a year, when its half year and full year results are announced and an interim report and a full report are issued to shareholders. At the same time, executive directors give presentations on the results to institutional investors, analysts and the media in London and other international centres.

The Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the company takes place in London and formal notification is sent to shareholders with the annual report at least 20 working days in advance of the meeting.The directors are available, formally during the AGM, and informally afterwards, for questions. Details of the 2000 AGM are set out in the notice of the meeting enclosed with this annual report.

During the year, the Chief Executive, Finance Director and executive directors maintain a dialogue with institutional shareholders on the company’s progress through a programme of meetings. All executive directors speak regularly at external conferences and presentations.

Accountability, Audit and Internal Control
The statement of directors’ responsibilities in relation to the accounts is set out on page 37[see PDF version of this document].

In its reporting to shareholders, the board aims to present a balanced and understandable assessment of the group’s financial position and prospects.

The group has adopted the transitional approach to Internal Control under the Combined Code as outlined in the letter from the London Stock Exchange to listed companies in September 1999. As a result the directors confirm that they have reviewed the effectiveness of the group’s system of internal financial controls.

The existing risk management and internal control processes necessary to implement the guidance ‘Internal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code’ have been modified and a report on the application of the Internal Control principle D.2 will be included in the annual report and accounts for the year ending 31st March 2001.

The board has overall responsibility for the group’s system of internal controls, which are designed to meet the group’s needs and address the risks to which it is exposed. Such a system can provide reasonable but not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.

The group’s organisational structure is focused on its three wholly owned divisions. These entities are all separately managed, but report to the board through a board director. The executive management team receive monthly summaries of financial results from each division through a standardised reporting process.

The board meets annually to consider the strategy for individual divisions and again annually to review three year financial plans.The group has in place a comprehensive annual budgeting process including forecasts for the next two years. Variances from budget are closely monitored.The group’s treasury policies are discussed in the financial review on page 10. The principal aspects of these policies are approved by the board. Specific criteria exist for the approval of significant contracts and other legal agreements. A committee of the board reviews significant items of this nature.

The Group Control Manual, which is distributed to all group operations, clearly sets out the composition, responsibilities and authority limits of the various board and executive committees and also specifies what may be decided without central approval. It is supplemented by other specialist policy and procedures manuals issued by the group, divisions and individual business units or departments.The high intrinsic value of many of the metals with which the group is associated necessitates stringent physical controls over precious metals held at the group’s sites.

The internal audit function is responsible for monitoring the group’s systems of internal financial controls and the control and the integrity of the financial information reported to the board.The Audit Committee receives the reports produced by the internal audit function on a regular basis. Actions are agreed with management in response to the internal audit reports produced. In addition, significant business units through a programme of self-assessment provide assurance on the maintenance of financial controls and compliance with group policies. These assessments are summarised by the internal audit function and a report is made annually to the Audit Committee.

Non-Compliance with the Combined Code
The item in the Code with which the company did not comply in full throughout the period together with the appropriate Code reference is stated below:

Three of the executive directors are employed on contracts subject to two years’ notice at any time, which the MDRC considers appropriate in the overall context of the executive directors’ terms of employment. It is not currently proposed that this should be reduced further for existing service contracts. In the event of early termination of service contracts the MDRC strongly endorses the principle of requiring the directors to mitigate their loss (B.1.7).

Going Concern
The directors have a reasonable expectation that the group has sufficient resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and have, therefore, adopted the going concern basis in preparing the accounts.


Previous pageTable of Contents

Return to main site

©2001 Johnson Matthey plc. Disclaimer and copyright notice.